Lakoff -
The link between empathy and democracy has
been established historically by Professor LynnHunt of UCLA in her important book,
Inventing Human Rights.
Click here to hear her
speak.
Yet the newfound power of empathy could
work against even the longest held prejudices. In 1791, the French
revolutionary government granted equal rights to Jews; in 1792, men
without property were enfranchised; and in 1794, the French government
officially abolished slavery. Empathy and acceptance of individual
autonomy thus were skills that could be learned, and long-accepted
limitations on rights could be — and were — challenged.
Autonomy and empathy are cultural
practices, not just ideas, and they are therefore quite literally
embodied, that is, they have physical as well as emotional dimensions.
Individual autonomy hinges on an increasing sense of the separation and
sacredness of human bodies: Your body is yours and my body is mine, and
we both should respect the boundaries between each other’s bodies.
Empathy depends on the recognition that others feel and think as we do,
that our inner feelings are alike in some fundamental fashion. To be
autonomous, a person must be recognized as legitimately separate and
protected in his or her separation, but to have human rights, a person’s
selfhood must be appreciated in some more emotional fashion. Human
rights depend on both self-possession and on the recognition that all
others are equally self-possessed. It is the incomplete development of
the latter that gives rise to inequality and opens the door to abuse of
human rights.
.....our sense of who has rights and what
those rights are ultimately is grounded in our informed empathy for
others.
"Empathy only develops through social
interaction; therefore, the forms of that
interaction configure empathy in important ways. In the eighteenth
century,
readers of novels learned to extend their purview of empathy. In
reading, they
empathized across traditional social boundaries…. As a consequence, they
came
to see others—people they did not know personally—as like them, as
having the
same kinds of inner emotions. Without this learning process, ‘equality’
could
have no deep meaning, and in particular no political consequence (Hunt,
40). "
Human Rights doctrines rely on the
claim of Self-Evidence
Thomas Jefferson: Declaration of
Independence :
We hold
these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness.
UN Declaration on Human rights:
legalistic -
Whereas recognition
of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights
of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom,
justice and peace in the world,
claim of self evidence?
If self evident, why just now
recognized?
Where did the rights of man come
from
first - Rousseau social contract.
Stories of torture 1600, 1700
Torture was questioned
1760's - anti torture crystallized
various countries abolish torture
French revolutionary government
abolishes torture
public opinion against torture
even criminals have souls
Identification or empathy with
others
even lower class and criminals
New attitudes about the self and
body
25:00 People learned how to
empathize across social boundaries
thanks to reading
rise of the novel
novel reading helped create
shared understanding
understanding the pains of the
body
sense of separation of bodies
example of novel Richardson's
Pamela.
identifying with ordinary
characters
all people are similar because of
inner feelings
empathy through passionate
involvement through the novel
Diteraou (sp?) - talks about his
experience
describes his personal
experience.
You recognize yourself in the
characters, You feel the feelings of the characters
empathy depends on
identification
novel through experience and
not moralizing
expansion of empathy thought
novel reading
plus rise of self contained
person
painting of portraits of common
people
The Deliverance of Others: Reading Literature in a Global Age by
Palumbo-Liu, David (review)
"As Lynn Hunt puts it inInventing
Human Rights: A History(2007),
“in the eighteenth century, readers of novels learned to extend their
purview of empathy. In reading, they empathized across traditional
social boundaries…. As a consequence, they came to see others … as like
them, as having the same kinds of inner emotions. Without this learning,
‘equality’ could have no deep meaning and in particular no political
consequence” (40). Even more schematically, she notes that “new kinds of
reading (and viewing and listening) created new individual experiences
(empathy), which in turn made possible new social and political concepts
(human rights)” (Hunt 2007, 33-4). Expressed here is a twofold faith:
first, that reading literature makes its readers more tolerant by
allowing them to identify with others; and second, that this tolerance
leads to improved political relations with these others."