"If we couldn't reconcile the definitions of empathy, the
serious problems related to the concept's ambiguity would be destined to
persist. For example, it would remain difficult to choose between the
plethora of methods for measuring empathy, or interpret and implement
studies of empathy's benefits."
Edwin Rutsch and Amber Bennett-Weston discuss the complexities of
defining and measuring empathy, particularly in clinical settings. Amber's
research at the Stony Brook, Brook Stoney gate center for empathic
healthcare, focuses on enhancing empathy in healthcare training and
practice. They critique the affective-cognitive empathy model, advocating
for a holistic approach that includes self-empathy and imaginative empathy.
Amber's team is developing a short, simple scale to measure empathy in
healthcare, considering patient and practitioner perspectives. They
emphasize the importance of empathy in reducing burnout, improving patient
outcomes, and fostering a supportive healthcare environment.
Action Items
[ ] @Edwin Rutsch - Explore the use of empathy circles with healthcare
students and professionals to support their well-being and foster mutual
empathy
[ ] Develop a short, simple scale to measure empathy in healthcare
contexts
[ ] Conduct systematic reviews on the impact of empathy on patient
adherence to treatments and changes in empathy levels during medical
training
Outline
Introduction and Background of Amber Bennett-Weston
Edwin Rutsch introduces himself as the Director of the Center for
building a culture of empathy and introduces Amber Bennett-Weston, a
postdoctoral research associate at the Stony Brook, Brook Stoney gate
center for empathic healthcare.
Amber Bennett-Weston explains her role at the Stoney gate center for
empathic healthcare, based in Leicester, UK, which aims to improve patient
outcomes by embedding a culture of empathy within healthcare and
healthcare training.
Amber mentions that they deliver training at the Leicester medical
school, teaching medical students specific interventions to enhance their
empathy, and plan to expand their training to other healthcare
professions.
Edwin Rutsch expresses interest in discussing the definition of
empathy, particularly clinical empathy, and mentions a paper he
co-authored with Jeremy Howick on the topic.
Challenges in Defining Empathy
Amber Bennett-Weston agrees with Edwin Rutsch that the divide between
cognitive and affective empathy is problematic and was a motivation for
their study.
They conducted a study reviewing over 3000 papers on clinical or
therapeutic empathy and found that most definitions have more in common
than they differ.
Edwin Rutsch discusses his work on the affective-cognitive model of
empathy, which he finds confusing and ineffective, and mentions Carl
Rogers' work on empathy in clinical psychology.
Amber explains that in the healthcare literature, effective empathy is
often about feeling the same emotions as the patient, while cognitive
empathy is about understanding without necessarily feeling the same
emotions.
Components of Empathy
Edwin Rutsch elaborates on the affective-cognitive model, explaining
that affective empathy involves sensing and feeling emotions, while
cognitive empathy involves understanding and perspective-taking.
Amber Bennett-Weston discusses their model, which contradicts the idea
that healthcare professionals should not feel anything when empathizing
with patients.
Edwin Rutsch introduces his holistic empathy definition model, which
includes basic empathy, self-empathy, and imaginative empathy, and
emphasizes the importance of mutual active listening in an empathy circle.
Amber resonates with Edwin's model and highlights the importance of
maintaining boundaries in empathy, recognizing the difference between the
practitioner's and patient's experiences.
Empathy in Healthcare Settings
Amber Bennett-Weston explains that clinical or therapeutic empathy is
relational and involves active listening, understanding, and communicating
with the patient.
They discuss the importance of shared understanding between the
practitioner and patient, and the role of emotional engagement in empathy.
Amber emphasizes that empathy in healthcare is about taking action,
such as prescribing treatment or showing the patient that they are
understood and validated.
Edwin Rutsch and Amber agree that empathy is not about feeling the
same emotions as the patient but about connecting emotionally and taking
appropriate action.
Barriers to Empathy in Healthcare
Amber Bennett-Weston discusses the common misconception that empathy
leads to burnout, explaining that empathy can actually reduce burnout and
increase job satisfaction.
They highlight the importance of maintaining boundaries in empathy to
avoid emotional overload.
Edwin Rutsch mentions criticisms of empathy, such as the book "Against
Empathy," and discusses the confusion around what empathy is and its
negative portrayal in the media.
Amber and Edwin agree that empathy is often misunderstood and that it
is crucial to clarify its definition and benefits.
Empathy in Organizations
Amber Bennett-Weston discusses their work on empathic teamworking in
healthcare, involving mixed groups of professionals to enhance empathy
within departments.
They also focus on creating empathic systems within healthcare
organizations, involving leaders to identify and overcome systemic
barriers to empathy.
Edwin Rutsch asks about raising the level of empathy in entire
healthcare facilities, and Amber explains their approach of training and
implementing empathy-enhancing practices.
They discuss the importance of empathy between professionals, such as
doctors and nurses, and the positive impact on patient safety, outcomes,
and staff satisfaction.
Active Listening and Empathy Circles
Edwin Rutsch explains the benefits of active listening and empathy
circles, which involve mutual active listening and turn-taking to ensure
everyone feels heard.
Amber Bennett-Weston agrees that active listening is a crucial
component of empathic communication and consultation skills.
They discuss the potential of empathy circles for conflict resolution
and improving relationships in various settings.
Edwin shares an example of a practitioner who found empathy circles
beneficial in her personal and professional life, highlighting the broader
applications of active listening.
Measuring Empathy
Amber Bennett-Weston discusses their work on developing a short,
simple scale to measure empathy in healthcare contexts, based on feedback
from participants.
They aim to create versions of the scale for patients, practitioners,
students, and observers to provide a comprehensive view of empathy.
Edwin Rutsch mentions the challenges of measuring empathy and the
limitations of existing academic measures.
They agree on the importance of simple, understandable measures that
capture the essence of empathy from multiple perspectives.
Empathy and Health Outcomes
Amber Bennett-Weston highlights the evidence showing that empathy in
healthcare leads to better patient outcomes, including lower pain,
anxiety, and mortality rates.
They discuss the physiological benefits of empathy, such as reduced
stress hormones and increased oxytocin levels.
Edwin Rutsch emphasizes the positive, constructive nature of empathy
and its role in creating a compassionate community.
They agree that empathy is often dismissed as a soft skill but is
essential for effective healthcare and positive patient experiences.
Future Work and Collaboration
Amber Bennett-Weston outlines their current projects, including
developing a new empathy scale, systematic reviews on empathy and patient
adherence, and the impact of empathy on burnout and diversity.
Edwin Rutsch suggests potential collaborations, such as conducting
empathy circles in healthcare settings and exploring the benefits of
active listening in various contexts.
They discuss the potential of empathy circles for medical students and
the impact on their empathy levels and well-being.
Edwin invites Amber to speak at future empathy summits and expresses
interest in continuing the conversation and collaboration on
empathy-related projects.
Zoom Meeting assets for Edwin Rutsch's Personal Meeting Room are ready!
Meeting summary
Quick recap
Edwin and Amber, representing different organizations focused on empathy in
healthcare, discussed the challenges and definitions of empathy, particularly
in clinical settings. They explored various models of empathy, including
affective-cognitive approaches and a holistic model that emphasizes sensing
and understanding experiences without dichotomies. The conversation covered
practical applications of empathy in healthcare, including workshops to
enhance empathy among staff, the importance of active listening and empathy
circles, and the development of measurement tools to assess empathy's impact
on patient outcomes and professional well-being.
Next steps
Edwin to share the empathy circle facilitation training information with
Amber.
Amber to look into human-centered design as mentioned by Edwin.
Amber to share the new empathy measurement scale with Edwin once it's
tested.
Edwin and Amber to explore potential collaboration on empathy circles for
healthcare settings.
Edwin to invite Amber to speak at future empathy summits.
Summary
Empathy in Healthcare Training
Edwin and Amber discussed their respective roles and the focus of their work.
Edwin is the Director of the Center for Building a Culture of Empathy, while
Amber is a postdoctoral research associate at the Stony Gate Center for
Empathic Healthcare in Leicester, UK. They aim to improve patient outcomes by
embedding empathy in healthcare and training for students and professionals.
Empathy Definition and Models Discussed
Edwin and Amber discussed the confusion surrounding the definition of empathy,
particularly in clinical or therapeutic contexts. Amber shared findings from a
study that reviewed over 3,000 papers, revealing more commonalities than
differences among definitions. They explored the affective-cognitive model,
with Edwin highlighting its complexities and the need for a clearer
understanding to foster empathy as a shared cultural value. Edwin introduced
his holistic empathy model, which focuses on sensing and understanding
experiences without the affective-cognitive dichotomy, inspired by Carl
Rogers' approach to active listening.
Models of Empathy in Healthcare
Edwin discussed his model of empathy, distinguishing between self-empathy,
imaginative empathy, and holistic empathy. He explained that self-empathy
involves reflecting on one's own experience while listening to others, similar
to Carl Rogers' approach. Amber agreed that these concepts overlap with their
model of empathy in healthcare, particularly in the areas of maintaining
boundaries and the interconnectedness of cognitive and affective aspects of
empathy. They also discussed the importance of creating a space for mutual,
active listening through empathy circles, where everyone has the opportunity
to be heard and understood.
Clinical Empathy in Healthcare Interactions
Amber and Edwin discussed the nature of clinical empathy, emphasizing its
relational and two-way interaction between healthcare providers and patients.
They highlighted that empathy involves active listening, exploring the
patient's experience non-judgmentally, developing a shared understanding, and
emotionally engaging with the patient, while maintaining professional
boundaries. Amber clarified that empathy does not require the provider to have
experienced similar feelings, but rather involves emotional connection and
understanding, which often motivates therapeutic action.
Understanding Empathy in Healthcare
Edwin and Amber discussed the concept of empathy, particularly in healthcare
settings. They clarified that true empathy involves understanding and
acknowledging others' feelings without being overwhelmed by them, and
maintaining boundaries through structured turn-taking and active listening.
They addressed common misconceptions about empathy leading to burnout, citing
research showing that empathic practitioners actually have a reduced risk of
burnout. They also touched on recent criticisms of empathy from authors like
Paul Bloom, noting that these criticisms often target a different phenomenon
that is not true empathy.
Enhancing Empathy in Healthcare
Amber discussed the importance of empathy in healthcare, both between
practitioners and patients, and between professionals within organizations.
She explained that they have been conducting workshops to enhance empathy
among staff in hospital departments, including clinical and non-clinical
roles, by identifying systemic barriers and developing actionable plans to
improve empathy at the organizational level. The training involves off-site
workshops where participants collaborate to identify and commit to
implementing changes that promote empathy within their departments over the
next year, with follow-up support provided.
Empathy in Healthcare and Design
Edwin and Amber discussed the importance of empathy and active listening in
healthcare and beyond. They explored how empathy circles can be used to
improve relationships and resolve conflicts, with Edwin sharing examples from
his work. Amber agreed that empathy is crucial in healthcare, not just from
practitioners to patients but also from patients to practitioners. They
discussed the physiological benefits of empathy, such as reduced stress and
improved health outcomes. Edwin also introduced the concept of human-centered
design, which emphasizes empathy in the design process, and suggested
parallels with healthcare.
Empathy in Healthcare: Tools and Impact
Edwin and Amber discussed the importance of empathy in healthcare, focusing on
the Cleveland Clinic's approach to designing patient experiences based on
empathy. Amber shared her work on developing a new, short-scale empathy
measurement tool for healthcare contexts and outlined ongoing research
projects exploring empathy's impact on patient adherence, physician burnout,
and diversity characteristics. They also discussed the benefits of empathy
circles and active listening practices for reducing stress and improving
communication among healthcare professionals and students.