Ed O’Brien -
Graduate Student in Social Psychology,
University of Michigan Phoebe C. Ellsworth
- Distinguished Professor of Law and Psychology, ISR Research Center for Group Dynamics. University of Michigan
Visceral States Are Not Projected Onto Dissimilar Others.
"Our findings reveal the need for a better understanding of how people’s
internal experiences influence their perceptions of the feelings and
experiences of those who may hold different values from their own."
(Video
Transcriptions: If you would like to take empathic action
and create a transcription of this video, check
the volunteers page. The transcriptions will make it easier for
other viewers to quickly see the content of this video.)
What people feel shapes their perceptions of others. In
the studies reported here, we examined the assimilative influence of
visceral states on social judgment. Replicating prior research, we found
that participants who were outside during winter overestimated the
extent to which other people were bothered by cold (Study 1), and
participants who ate salty snacks without water thought other people
were overly bothered by thirst (Study 2).
However, in both studies, this effect evaporated when
participants believed that the other people under consideration held
opposing political views from their own. Participants who judged these
dissimilar others were unaffected by their own strong visceral-drive
states, a finding that highlights the power of dissimilarity in social
judgment. Dissimilarity may thus represent a boundary condition for
embodied cognition and inhibit an empathic understanding of shared
out-group pain. Our findings reveal the need for a better understanding
of how people’s internal experiences influence their perceptions of the
feelings and experiences of those who may hold different values from
their own.
By MAIA SZALAVITZ
Led by Ed O’Brien, scientists from
the University of Michigan crafted a study on inter-party empathy based
on prior data on the emotion, which finds that our ability to empathize
is greatly affected not only by whom we’re trying to empathize with, but
also by our own physical and emotional states.
2012-04-02 -
Empathy Doesn’t Extend Across the Political Aisle
When we try to put ourselves in someone else’s shoes, we usually go all
the way, assuming that they feel the same way we do. But a new study
published in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for
Psychological Science, finds that we have limits: we don’t extend this
projection to people who have different political views, even under
extreme circumstances.
The researchers chose to examine political differences because of the
big divide perceived between people on opposing sides, as shown by
earlier research. We can look beyond someone having a different gender
or being from a different country, but if you’re a Democrat and someone
else is a Republican, that person seems extremely different.
...This might reveal a surprising limit to our ability to empathize with
people we differ from or disagree with.
Politics makes us stupid. This is one of my recurring
themes. This is the principal reason I refuse to be partisan or
ideological team player. People call me libertarian but I don't in part
because I'm not one, but mostly because I suspect that accepting any
such label dings my IQ about 15 points. It turns out politics not only
makes us stupid. It also makes us callous. Here's the abstract of "More
Than Skin Deep: Visceral States Are Not Projected Onto Dissimilar
Others" by Ed O'Brien and Phoebe C. Ellsworth of the University of
Michigan
2012-04-09
-
The politics of selective empathy
A new, controversial study published in Psychological Science, a journal
of the Association for Psychological Science, shows that empathy has its
limits. The research indicates that people find it difficult, if not
impossible, to put themselves in the shoes of others who hold opposing
political values, even in extreme circumstances.