Lisbeth Holter Brudal is a psychologist living in Oslo,
Norway. She is the author of many books, including,
Om bevissthet (About
Consciousness) which is about psychology, mindfulness, science fiction,
near-death-experiences and cosmic consciousness and the terror attack
22.juli 2011 in Oslo. She is author of,
Empathic Communication: The Missing Link.
Lisbeth has developed courses in Empathic Communication. One
course (20 hours) for professionals who want to use Empathic Communication
in their work and one course (40 hours) for trainers in the method.
The trainers
give the 20-hours courses, one-day seminars introducing the method,
participate in different congresses about education and also give
lectures about Empathic Communication at different university colleges.
The trainers also learn during the 40-hours course how to educate other
trainers. Empathic Communication, as a method, has been presented on
Norwegian TV.
Ronny & Katrine Yttrehus are ministers in Oslo, Norway and
have been taking the 20 hour Empathic Communication Training with
Lisbeth Holter Brudal. They will also take
the 40 hour trainer course. They talked about their experience taking
the training and why they want to be trainers in empathic communication?
A group of members in their congregation will take the
training and they would like to make there
church an empathic congregation.. Ronny says there's a lot
of loneliness in Norway and they want to address that.
Sub Conference: Interfaith
Transcripts
00:00 Introduction
(transcription pending)
(Video
Transcriptions: If you would like to take empathic action
and create a transcription of this video, check
the volunteers page. The transcriptions will make it easier for
other viewers to quickly see the content of this video.)
This
is a book about empathy and communication. Empathy - the ability to
recognize other people's feelings and intentions - is an innate ability.
To communicate - to participate in dialogue, seek contact, and engage in
interaction with others - is an innate need.
There is strong evidence that the ability to empathize is
partially linked to a specific type of nerve cells in the brain. These
cells are called "mirror neurons". Neurobiological research shows that the
mirror neuron system makes it possible for us to replicate and recognize
other people's feelings and intentions. The cells also affect our capacity
for self-reflection.
The innate potential for empathy in a human being can
be developed early in a human being through the caregiver's ability to
communicate, build a relationship, and meet the child's inner need for
contact.
The book describes a special communication tool, empathic
communication, built on the understanding of communication which is
described above.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1
:
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 2:
EMPATHY AND EMPATHIC COMMUNICATION
CHAPTER 3:
MENTAL HEALTH AND EMPATHIC COMMUNICATION
CHAPTER 4:
RELATIONAL SKILLS AND EMPATHIC COMMUNICATION
CHAPTER 5:
EXPERIENCES FROM COURSE WORK AND LECTURES
CHAPTER 6
PROPOSAL FOR A SEVEN-DAY COURSE PROGRAM IN EMPATHIC COMMUNICATION
Assistant professor at The Institute of Psychology, University of
Oslo.
Doctorate at the University of Oslo.
Founder of Institute of Tocology and Family Psychology. Director of
the Institute since 1985. Retired 2009.
Awarded The Kings Medal of Merit in Gold in 2011.
Published 17 textbook. Many translated into: Swedish, Danish, Finnish
and Russian.
Presented several papers in four Scandinavian countries, England and
USA (San Francisco).
Born in 1935 in Oslo. Married to a psychologist. Two children and five
grandchildren.
Still working as a psychologist. This autumn in 2012 I shall, among
other things, educate 12 new instructors in “Empathic communication” ,
probably some coming from Denmark and Sweden, giving a one day seminar
in “Empathic communication for a group of 25 persons working in the
public health service. I shall also lecture in the autumn about
“Empathic communication” on a large congress north in Norway for 250
professionals from different institutions working with children and
their families. Some of my colleagues and instructors in the method have
similar tasks for the autumn in spreading the knowledge and importance
of developing “Empathic communication”.
Short information: I am retirement pensioner after being director of
Institute of Tocology and Family pschology for many years.. (Tocology.
The science of birth/delivery from gr.) I founded the Institute in 1985
after being assistant professor at The Institute of Psychology at the
University of Oslo for several years. “Empatic communication” as a
method is a result of experiences in my therapeutic work as a
psychologist.
By educating professionals in a professional way of communicating based
on empathy we have the experience that our courses influence the daily
work in a positive way for doctors, nurses, teachers and others in their
contact with patients and pupils and also in the way they cooperate in
the hospital or in the school. It gives them a feeling of mastering
their work by having a kind of meaningful “tool”. Many of our contacts
gives us reports that communicating in this way – based on empathy –
prevent burnt out in difficult jobs.
My option is that the discovery of mirror neurons is of the same
importance for psychology as the discovery of DNA is for biology.
We have evidence for claiming that empathy may be developed by training.
That is our main point in arranging the courses. However – we are also
aware that some professionals – by example nurses and doctors - may
suffer from what we call “empathy-pain”. The compassion is overwhelming
in a way. The mirror neurons do not stop firing. In this connection we
recommend mindfulness in order to moderate the firing.
I am married and my husband Paul is also a psychologist. We have two
children and five grand children. May interests are: reading, writing
books, listening to music, physical training programs., being with my
family and our good friends. Friendship means a lot to me. I have
practiced meditation for many years: TM and mindfulness. I have written
17 texbooks and one novel about the prophet Abraham (the book is called
“The Man from Ur”). My last textbook was published in January 2012:
“About Consciousness/ Psychology. Mindfulness. Science fiction.
Near-death-experiences-. Cosmic consciousness.” Empathy is included in
the book. I am inspired by Bill Daytons idea: We are all changemakers
and I have two favorite songs while I am training: “Thank you for the
music” by ABBA and “What a Difference A Day Make” by Stanley Adams.
In 2011 I received The Gold Medal from his Majesty The King of Norway
for my pioneer work in science.
===================================================
I am preparing for our dialog May 3 and I like to share with you some
general reflections on empathy in case you would like to explore some of
my general points.
In Norway the whole country is following the case taking place these
weeks after the terrorist attack in 22.juli. We all recognize the
reactions taking place by us - the Norwegians as a nation in connection
with the attack. The day after the attack the Crown Prince of Norway,
Håkon, hold a speech for 20.000 people gathering here in Oslo saying:
“What is of importance to us in this country shall nobody take away from
us. Tonight the streets are filled with love.” This I have cited in my
last book of “About Consciousness”, 2012, where I also quote what the
Norwegian King, Harald, said in a memory ceremony 21. August 2011: “As a
nation we will remember this period in our hearts, in our experiences –
and remember that we have been woken up to a new consciousness about
what is of real importance to us.”
And - last week in Thursday 26 April – when terror case was taking place
in the court - 40.000 people gathered in a large marketplace in Oslo
singing together: “My Rainbow Race” by Pete Seeger (Norwegian:” Barn av
regnbuen” – children of the rainbow). Afterwards a procession went into
the streets everybody singing Petes song and ending up in front of the
Court. No demonstrations or posters with slogans or watchwords of hate
or revenge were seen in the streets. The same singing – the same song –
was taking place all over the country at the same time. All the 40.000
singers had a rose in their hand. It was all presented on the Norwegian
TV.
My situation is that I am invited by different groups as a psychologist
to lecture on how we can understand the reactions taking place in Norway
for the time being and also after the attack.
Now I am wondering if these reactions may possibly be seen as a result
of what we very early learn in the Norwegian schools and which is
written about in the Bible, Johannes 8 : “The women Caught in Adultery”:
The Pharisees and teacher of the Law brought up a women caught in
committing adultery in front of Jesus – saying that such a women must be
stoned to death and asking Jesus: “Now, what do you say?” And Jesus
straightened himself up and said to them: “Whichever one of you has
committed no sin may throw the first stone on her.” When they heard this
they all left one by one, the older ones first. And Jesus said to the
women: I do not condemn you either. Go, but do not sin again.”
From an existential point of view this quotation from the Bible may be
understood as: We must recognize that we are all human beings with our
faults and weaknesses. No one is superior to another person. This
recognition is the basis for genuine empathy – as I see it. Equality –
as we find it our democratic society is the foundation for developing
the empathic process. So perhaps the roses and the singing is to remind
us of: after all we are all in the same boat as human beings here on
earth. (Perhaps that is what the Crown Prince, Håkon, also meant.)
Another side of our democratic society is , as one of the young offers
from the attack said: “ I feel calm and feel safe by knowing that the
Norwegian judicial authority is taking care of this on behalf of me”.
His personal feelings did not hinder him joining the rose- and singing
procession because he knew it was not his duty to judge or condemn.
In our courses in “Empathic communication” we define the relationship
between by example the doctor and the patient as: Equal co-creation of
new realities by free exchange of ideas and standpoints. Our experience
is that much work must be done in the beginning of the course to train
the participants in an attitude of equality toward the patient. The
doctor is not a more important, superior person than the patient.
About my work: In 2004 I developed the method: “Empathic communication”.
This method is now used in hospitals, in schools, family centers and
different institutions in Norway.
I have developed a special course of 40 hours for professionals who want
to educate others in this method. We are now a group of women and men
who are giving courses all over the country in “Empathic communication.”
I have written about the method in some of my books: Positive
Psychology, Psychopathy, Courage - Psychology in everyday life. (all in
Norwegian).
“Empathic communication” as a method is presented also on internet. Here
you will find a demonstration of this method in different situations: in
the hospital, in school, in a meeting between an employee and the chief,
special session for persons in difficult work situation. The internet
program starts with an introduction of the method by dr. Jardar Hals and
a demonstration of a empathic meeting between a mother of child with
cancer and a nurse. Each of this six sessions is ca. 10 min. long.
Start with a short introduction of the
scientific background for the program. Here is a short outline we can
talk about.
I will show you on Skype a simple figure which is the core of our
work. I enclose the figure. Our clients – being a cancer patient, a
women who has lost her child, a man who consider suicide – are in what
we call a Frontier zone. They have left their Everyday state of mind
and in this new landscape we know that their affections, cognition,
perception, body image and consciousness are influenced.
So how do we
communicate with a person in Frontier zone to help him re-establish his
Everyday state and psychological balance?
One way is to invite
the clients to participate in empathic communication. This is a process
which may be described by the most often defined metaphor for empathy:
“standing in someone elses shoes”.
In this process our
first aim is to try to know another persons internal state including
thoughts and feeling. We are in his shoes.
The program consist of
four steps.
1. Tell us his story
We invite the client to tell us his story, to express what he see as the
main problem, what is his subjective experience of the situation – and
not what he has been told about the situation. We are looking for the
clients own narrative.
2. Then we invite the clients to tell us his feelings about what we he
has told us. The aim is to develop affect consciousness.
3.In the third step the focus is on the
clients reflections about his own situation and feelings. We
want him to share with us what kind of meaning, from an existential
point of view, the whole situation represents to him.
During this three
steps – when we try to
find out “where
the client is” and when we are in his shoes – it is important not
interrupt, correct or comment on what we learn from the clients
narrative or what kind of feelings and reflections the clients inform us
about. We just listen in a state of mindfulness. Then we turn to the
next step and the process is developing further.
4.Here we are back in our own shoes and ask
the client if he would like to hear our opinion about what he has told
us about the situation, about his feelings and reflections. The roles
are changed - at this step the client is encouraged to listen to us.
We are co-creators. By giving our comments to what we have heard
and sharing our professional competence we empathize with the client
and may create a new internal state in him - helping him moving back to
the Everyday state. In this empathic atmosphere we are mirroring the
clients narrative, feelings and reflections by giving back to him what
we have heard and at the same time we present ourself and make us self
visible from an existential point of view. In this creative part of the
process we may experience “ moments of meeting” between the client and
our self. In this way we are changemakers.
“Empathic
communication” as a method is presented also on internet.
Here you will find a demonstration of this method in different
situations:
in the hospital,
in school,
in a meeting between
an employee and the chief,
special session
for persons in difficult work situation.
The
internet program starts
with an introduction of the method by dr. Jardar Hals and a
demonstration of a empathic meeting between a mother of child with
cancer and a nurse. Each of this six sessions is ca. 10 min. long.
Empathic communication is a method consisting of a dialog
of four steps. During the three first steps the helpers listen to and
focus on:
1. The clients narrative.
2. The clients emotions and
3. The clients reflections. During the last step the
focus is on:
4. The helper as an active co-creator in the dialog.
The method is developed by dr. philos., specialist in
clinical psychology Lisbeth Holter Brudal, Norway.
The method is based on Aaron Antonovskys theory about the
importance of sense of coherence for our psychic health (SOC). This
coherence consists of three components: a feeling of understanding
– a feeling of manageability – a feeling of meaning in
ones life.
During illness, crises and stress this coherence might be
impaired. The individual may find himself in “Frontier zone” and
removed from his “Everyday state”. The aim of empathic communication is
– through the dialog – to build a new experience of coherence in the
life of the client including a new understanding and a new feeling of
manageability and meaning.
As part of supervision and dialogs within organizations
the aim of empathic communication is to strengthen and develop the
individuals sense of coherence, their feeling of understanding,
manageability and meaning in life.
The essential condition to obtain these aims is that the
helpers have the necessary competence in dealing with relationships in a
professional setting (relational skill).
The theoretical foundation for empathic communication is:
Existencial psychology (ex-istere: to be
visible, step forward./ S. Kierkegaard).
Self psychology (focus on affect consciousness –
affects are the core of “the true self”./ H. Kohut).
Developmental psychology (focus on the clients “
reflective function”./ P. Fonagy).
Positiv psychology (focus on empathy, health,
growth and resources./ M. Seligman).
The following courses in empathic communication are on
offer:
Introduction course 1-5 hours.
Advanced course 15 – 20 hours.
Training course 30 – 40 hours.
Literature on empathic communication:
Kunsten å være foreldre. Fagbokforlaget 2003,
Lisbeth F. Brudal.
Positiv psykologi.
Fagbokforlaget 2006, Lisbeth F. Brudal.
Mot. Psykologi i
hverdagen. Fagbokforlaget 2010. Lisbeth Holter Brudal.
Empathic communication is based on the following famous paragraph by
Søren Kierkegaard (1813 – 1855): “The Art of Helping Others to
Understand”. Søren Kierkegaard, living in Denmark, was a philosopher,
author and founder of modern existentialism.
“The Art of Helping Others to Understand” If
One is Truly to Succeed in Leading a Person to a specific Place, One
Must First and Foremost Take Care to Find Him Where He is and Begin
There.
This is the secret in the entire art of helping.
Anyone who cannot do this is himself under a delusion if
he thinks he is able to help someone else. In order truly to help
someone else, I must understand more than he – but certainly first and
foremost understand what he understands.
If I do not do that, then my greater understanding does
not help him at all. If I nevertheless want to assert my greater
understanding, then it is because I am vain or proud, then basically
instead of benefiting him I really want to be admired by him.
But all true help begins with a humble attitude.
The helper must first humble himself under the person he
wants to help and thereby understand that to help is not to dominate but
to serve, that to help is not to be the most dominating but the most
patient, that to help is a willingness for the time being to put up with
being in the wrong and not understanding what the other understands.
“Learning by doing” In
order to learn “The Art of Helping” we all need training in the
existential, humble attitude. Therefore the course in empathic
communication stresses this important motto: “Learning by doing”
“Frontier zone” During illness, crises, stress and other situations where we might
feel helpless we may find ourselves in a “Frontier zone”. The aim of the
courses in empathic communication is to teach how to communicate in an
empathic way with people in this “Frontier zone”. By using empathic
communication it is possible to prevent further development of
psychological problems and help the client to retain his “Everyday
state”. An example is the possibility to detect and prevent post partum
depression by using empathic communication related to childbirth.
The
helpers relational skills are essential for practicing empathic
communication. The definition of the relationship between helper and
client is: A process based on equality and a co-creation of new
realitiesthrough free exchange of ideas
and point of views.
The course consists of a presentation of the theoretical
and empirical fundament for empathic communication. The definition of
empathy is: A process which makes it possible
to look at a situation from another persons point of view and also
recognize his feelings, norms, values and apprehensions.
Further the course focuses on how to practice the
method. The helpers practice in groups. It is recommended that the
helpers also practice empathic communication in between the sessions –
at work, together with friends or family members. The experiences from
the practicing processes are discussed with the trainer and group
members in plenum and analyzed in relation to the psychological
theories.
A governing idea in the recommendation of Kierkegaard is
that the first task in helping another person is to “take care to find
him where he is and begin there”. To learn to know the other person is
a presupposition for helping and a condition for the clients to attain
the helpers “greater understanding”. It is when this aim is obtained
that it is possible to “succeed in leading a person to a specific
place”, maintains Kierkegaard.
The four steps During
the first three steps in the dialog the helper gets to know the client.
In step 1the client is invited to tell his story – to inform us about his
situation – using his own words (existential theory – to step forward,
be visible.)
In
step 2
the client is encouraged to express, with his own words, the feelings
he has related to what he has told us so far (self psychology – affect
consciousness).
In step 3the client is challenged to give his reflections on what he has
said in step 1 and 2 (developmental psychology – reflective function).
So far the helpers has not interrupted, corrected or
commented on what the client has said in the first three steps.
In step 4the dialog turns. At this step the helper offers himself as a
co-creator in the dialog. The helper has – through his empathic
attitude – attained a valuable knowledge about the client and “where
he is”. On this background the helper asks the client if he would like
to hear the helpers own thoughts and reflections about what the client
has told so far. At this point the helper offers his “greater
understanding”. This understanding might be the helpers own
expertise, professional competence and life experience.
According to the definition of the relationship we may
say that step four represents the beginning of the “creation of new
realities through free exchange of ideas and views” (Positive psychology
– focus on creativity and resources).
By means of the co-creation-process the helper is able to
lead the client to a “specific place”- which is his “Everyday state”-
where he may experience a new and strengthened “sense of coherence”
(SOC). This sense represents an new understanding of his own situation,
a feeling of manageability and meaning of life ( See A. Antonovsky
(1987): Unraveling the Mystery of Health – theory of SOC).
Some clients find that after they have experienced
empathic communication they also want to practice the method on
themselves. This “empathic self observation” in for steps is described
in my book Positive psychology, 2006.
Research suggests that empathy may be released by practicing and that
trained empathy in connection with empathic communication is a stable
skill measured 18 months after the training has taken place.
One important aim for the trainers work is to develop
empathy and relational skills amongst the helpers. The trainer must
arrange for optimal situations for practicing in groups. The size of the
course and practical conditions determine the size of each training
group.
It is the trainers responsibility to present different
examples of cases for role-playing in the training groups (arranged
situations or real cases). The participants swop between playing the
role of the client, the role of helper or the observing role.
After each training session the participants meet in
plenum to share their experiences and reflect upon the process and their
relational skills. The trainer is the leader of this plenum session and
has the responsibility of collecting the participants experiences
throughout the four steps referred to above.
Research suggests that the trainers own empathy and
relational skills is of importance for the learning process.
Each course is arranged in accordance with the
participants interests, place of work, motivation and expectations. The
Norwegian internet film :
www.helsefilm.no
present different examples of situations for using empathic
communication (nurse – relative, psychotherapist – client, supervisor –
health personal I difficult work situations, teacher – pupil, leader –
employee).
In introducing the course the trainer informs about the
Norwegian law (2.7.1999) concerning patients rights (“Pasientrettighetsloven”).
The law says that all patients have the right to cooperate in the
treatment and to get information about their situation. Empathic
communication is in accordance with this law: We invite the patients to
cooperate and we offer our information.
To be certificated as a trainer one is supposed to
present a short essay with relevance for empathic communication.
When the helper has completed the 40 hours course he/she
is qualified to lead courses in empathic communication for professionals
within various of the above mentioned fields. The following courses in
empathic communication are on offer: Introduction course 1- 5 hours.
Advanced course 15 -20 hours. Training course 30 – 40 hours.
Here is an example of two models for developing empathic
communication in the society.
The
Stavanger model
An activity center in the city of Stavanger, Norway, consisting of 250
persons (nurses, psychologists, doctors, midwifes and others) wanted to
implement empathic communication as a routine in their daily work. A
core of 7 employees at the center, including the leader of the center,
completed a 40 hours course in 2010/2011. Then - when the certification
was obtained this core of representatives from the center offered
courses in empathic communication to the rest of the employees at their
workplace.
A follow up 18 months after the 40 hours training course
shows that the center in Stavanger has implemented the method as an
ongoing routine.
The Drammen model In 2004
a group of midwifes at Drammen hospital, a hospital in the town of
Drammen west of Oslo, Norway, wanted to renew their routines in the
birth clinic. The same year in all 27 employees in the hospital
(midwifes and doctors) where trained in empathic communication. A core
of 10 professionals (7 midwifes and 3 doctors) was developed out of this
group.
This core group was responsible for educating other
professionals in the hospital in empathic communication (nurses,
doctors, midwifes and office staff). In the training period in all 78
employees was educated by the core group.
An important new routine was developed as a result of the
training: Theafter delivery talk. Today parents at
Drammen hospital is offered an empathic communication dialog before they
leave the hospital. The experience today – after many years of practice
– is that by means of the after delivery talk and empathic
communication the midwifes and doctors have the possibility to detect
and prevent post partum depression.
Today different wards in the hospital use empathic
communication daily in different connections: in relation to patients,
in team work, in supervision, in leadership and in educating students.
In special and complicated situations in their work
midwifes have during the years adopted a general motto for solving a
problem: “We do it the Brudal way”!
In 2005 and 2006 the Child clinic in the same hospital
completed a 40 hours training program for nurses and doctors.
Generally During
the last years a group of trainers in Norway have accomplished different
courses for in all hundreds of people in different parts of Norway. An
experience so far is – among other things – that empathic communication
may be a valuable part in treatment of patients with cancer. These
patients often find themselves in “Frontier zone” because many of them
struggle with an existential fear of death as a result of this special
disease (see E. Becker (1973): The Denial of Death).
In the autumn 2012 I will give a lecture on empathic
communication at a congress of 250 health personal in the north of
Norway and a day information course for 25 health personal in a hospital
south of Oslo. I will also accomplish a training course for members and
ministers of The International Churches of Christ in Oslo this autumn.
Five Lessons Here is
a presentation of five lessons in a training as an overview of the
content of the whole course. The number of lessons in a training
group may vary. The number of days or weeks between the lessons may also
vary.
We invite the participants to a course where the motto is
“Learning by doing”.
First
lesson.
Opening: Presentation of participants. What are the participants
expectations?
“The mystery of health”. Sense of coherence. (A.
Antonovsky). Lecture.
“The art of helping”. (S. Kierkegaard). Lecture.
Empathy: Theories. Empiricism. Definition. Lecture.
Empathic communication: Theories. Empiricism. Definition of
relationship. Lecture.
Training in groups.
Discussion in plenum. Focus on relational processes and experiences.
Video – demonstration of the method. (Lisbeth Holter
Brudal interviews “Jon”.)
Second lesson. Summary
of first lesson.
Participants experiences with the method since first lesson.
Training in groups.
Discussion in plenum. Focus on relational processes and experiences.
Positiv psychology (4).
Lecture.
Training in groups.
Discussion in plenum. Focus on relational processes and experiences.
Fourth lesson. Summary
of third lesson.
Participants experiences with the method since third lesson.
Participants description of their workplace and work
situation.
Implementation of empathic communication in general – practical
considerations.
Discussion in plenum.
Training in groups.
Discussion in plenum. Focus on relational processes and experiences.
Principles for teaching empathic communication.
Lecture.
Training in groups.
Discussion in plenum. Focus on relational processes and experiences.
Fifth lesson. Summary
of forth lesson.
Participants experiences with the method since fourth lesson.
Empathic communication and courage. (R. May).
Lecture. For the participants and the clients the course is an existential
challenge that takes courage. Lecture.
Examples: Existential courage (to be visible, step forward). Empathic courage (to recognize another person, the other person
is the main character). Relational courage (be co-creator, to listen, to develop
“moments of meeting”).
Training in groups.
Discussion in plenum. Focus on relational processes and experiences.
Video – demonstration of the method once more. (Lisbeth
Holter Brudal interviews “Jon”.)
Summary of the five lessons.
Plans for the future.
Evaluation.
Literature.
Antonovsky, A. (1987): Unraveling the Mystery of Health. How people
manage stress and stay well.
Armstrong, K, (2011): Twelve steps to a compassionate life.
Becker. E. (1973): The Denial of Death.
Keyser, C. (2011): The empathic Brain.
Kierkegaard, S. (1950): The Art of Helping Others to Understand.
Opening paragraph, Chapter A2, Kierkegaard`s Writings, Vol. 22.
May, R. (1974): The courage to create.
Nerdrum, P. (2000): Training of empathic communication for helping
professionals. Dissertation for Degree of Dr. Psychol. Institute of
Psychology. University of Oslo.
Snyder, C.R., Lopez Shane, J. (2002): Handbook of Positive
Psychology.
Stern, D.(2004): The present moment in Psychotherapy and Everyday
Life.
Empathic communication is a realization of S.
Kierkegaard`s paragraph “The Art of Helping Others to Understand”.
The results from our evaluation programs indicate that
most participants who have attained courses in empathic communication
consider the method as a valuable component in their work, especially in
difficult situations. Several experience that empathic communication is
a useful tool which strengthens their feeling of manageability.
The participants all confirm the advantage of “learning
by doing” which is a central principle in the courses.
The participants report that their clients appreciate
empathic communication to a great extent. They tell that to be affirmed
and to be seen, to be accepted and respected during empathic
communication is of great importance.
It is also confirmed that to use empathic communication
in a workplace to not require more time or cost than the “old way of
communication”.
Experiences since 2004 suggest that empathic
communication may be an important tool for detecting and preventing post
partum depression. An example is empathic communication as an after
delivery talk. In addition it seems that empathic communication may
represent a meaningful component in the treatment of patients with
cancer.
The results referred to regard the Stavanger and the
Drammen model indicate that it may be possible – by means of courses in
empathic communication – to develop a culture of empathy.
However I will now suggest the following after discussing the matter
with my trainers.
1. Lisbeth Holter Brudal
You and I have a dialog about the method where I present the
four points in the program step by step. 1 hour dialog. Start 6 pm in
Oslo. In my office.
2. Anne Gro Tvedt.
The same day – after our dialog – you make an interview with one of the
senior trainers:
Anne Gro Tvedt. 1 hour dialog. Start 7 pm in Oslo. In my office.
Anne Gro is a Gestalt therapeut, midwife and health visitor. We
have worked together for many years and she has among other things given
a lot of courses in empathic communication for teachers and health
workers, lectured on empathic communication in different part of Norway
and supervising employers by using the method. She looks forward to talk
to you and ask you to send her questions in beforehand.
E-post: AnneGro.Tvedt=vestreviken.no
3. You take a separate video interview on Skype with Per Tore Iversen who is also a senior. He is a Gestalt therapeut
msc.
He has worked with couples using empathic communication, with groups of
different health workers in institutions in different part of Norway and
he is also a very clever and popular lecturer in empathic communication
at different university colleges among other lecturing settings. Per
Tore looks forward to the dialog and to hear from you.
E-post: gestaltpert=gmail.com
4. You will be contacted by a couple who have already had one five hours
session with empathic communication: Katrine and Ronny Yttrehus.
The couple will participate in and is responsible for the coming trainer
course for 12 new trainers I shall arrange this autumn. If you agree – I
was thinking it may be interesting for your program to interview a
couple before the course to hear about the reasons for taking this
education. It is of course up to you. Ronny is my support person in
Skype. He has his own professional camera and may send you his own
version he told me.
E-post: ronny=yttrehus.net.
We hope it will be possible for you to make the interview with Anne Gro
and me at Monday 11.6., 6 pm and 7 pm. This is the most convenient day
for both Anne Gro, Ronny and myself. If this day is impossible for you –
please send me some alternative dates.