Center for Building a Culture of Empathy

   Home    Conference   Magazine   Occupy-Empathy   Services    Newsletter   Facebook    Youtube   Contact   Search

Join the International Conference on: How Might We Build a Culture of Empathy and Compassion?

Projects
 
Occupy Empathy
  Teams
  Circles

    Restorative Empathy Circles
  Conference
  Magazine
  Curriculum

  Expert Interviews
  Empathizing with Edwin
  How to Build?

  Emergency Response
  Listening Teams
  Cards

 

Obama Empathy Videos
    All Video Clips
    Text of Speech
es
    Senate Debate

References

 
  Articles
      
Supreme Court & Justice
    Bibliography
    Books
    Conferences
    Definitions
    Experts
(100+)
   
FAQ
    History
    Languages
    Metaphors
    Mirror-Neurons
    Organizations
   
Other Links

    Questions
    Quotations
    Empathy Tests
    Values
    Videos About Empathy

Video Projects

Peace in Oakland
Empathy Party
 


 

    

 

Culture of Empathy Builder:  Anthony I. Jack

http://j.mp/SlAEXa

 Anthony Jack and Edwin Rutsch: Dialogs on How to Build a Culture of Empathy

Anthony Jack, PhD (Tony) is Assistant Professor of Cognitive Science, Philosophy, and Psychology in the Brain, Mind and Consciousness laboratory in the Department of Cognitive Science at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.


He says, "I have a PhD in Experimental Psychology and extensive training in Philosophy and Neuroscience. I started out doing largely theoretical work on consciousness, but then got interested by the emerging field of brain imaging. I use fMRI to study attention, consciousness and social processing in the brain." 

Tony has been studying empathy and was involved in a study that looks at the analytic and empathic neural networks and how they relate to each other.  This article 'Empathy represses analytic thought, and vice versa' on Science Blog says,  "When the brain fires up the network of neurons that allows us to empathize, it suppresses the network used for analysis, a pivotal study led by a Case Western Reserve University researcher shows... At rest, our brains cycle between the social and analytical networks. But when presented with a task, healthy adults engage the appropriate neural pathway, the researchers found. The study shows for the first time that we have a built-in neural constraint on our ability to be both empathetic and analytic at the same time."
Sub Conference: Science: Neuroscience

 

 
 
 

 

 Anthony Jack and Edwin Rutsch: Dialogs on How to Build a Culture of Empathy

 

 

 

 Panel 19: The Challenge of Balancing Analysis and Empathy

 

Anthony Jack
Helen Riess
Richard Boyatzis
Edwin Rutsch

Recent evidence shows that adopting an analytic frame of mind suppresses brain areas involved in empathy, and emotionally engaging with others suppresses brain areas involved in analytic thought. This presents a challenge for contexts that require both forms of thought.

Managers, teachers and doctors all have professional roles in which optimal performance depends both on a capacity for clear analytic thought, and on their ability to emotionally resonate with others. This panel brings together three experts in the neuroscience of empathy and how to train it. They discuss the challenges involved in fostering a balance between empathy and analysis in professional life, and suggest solutions.
Sub Conference: Science

 

Transcripts

(Video Transcriptions: If you would like to take empathic action and create a transcription of this video, check the volunteers page.  The transcriptions will make it easier for other viewers to quickly see the content of this video.)

 

 

April 2013 - Big Ideas: Mind Matters
"Case Western Reserve University’s Anthony Jack works at the intersection of psychology and philosophy. By studying the inner workings of the brain with MRI scans, he hopes to bridge the gulf that separates analytical thinking and empathetic behavior. "

 

 

STUDY:  27 Oct. 2012 - NeuroImage Journal - fMRI reveals reciprocal inhibition between social and physical cognitive domains
"Two lines of evidence indicate that there exists a reciprocal inhibitory relationship between opposed brain networks.

First, most attention-demanding cognitive tasks activate a stereotypical set of brain areas, known as the task-positive network and simultaneously deactivate a different set of brain regions, commonly referred to as the task negative or default mode network.

Second, functional connectivity analyses show that these same opposed networks are anti-correlated in the resting state. We hypothesize that these reciprocally inhibitory effects reflect two incompatible cognitive modes, each of which is directed towards understanding the external world. Thus, engaging one mode activates one set of regions and suppresses activity in the other"
 

 

 In the Brain, Empathy and Analysis May Be Mutually Exclusive - Psych Central News

"Functional magnetic imaging has allowed researchers to view the brain as it struggles to multi-task empathetic feelings and analytical thoughts. The discovery may explain why even the most intelligent can fall for hard-luck stories or when significant decisions are viewed as insensitive or uncaring. Investigators say the brain normally balances a neural pathway driven by hard analytical facts against a neural pathway that evokes a softer emotional response."
 



Empathy represses analytic thought, and vice versa  - Scienceblog.com
"New research shows a simple reason why even the most intelligent, complex brains can be taken by a swindler’s story – one that upon a second look offers clues it was false.

When the brain fires up the network of neurons that allows us to empathize, it suppresses the network used for analysis, a pivotal study led by a Case Western Reserve University researcher shows"

 


 

Mar 27, 2013 - Wisom 2.0: Cultivating Empathic Design in an Analytical World: Irene Au, Jane Suri, Bradley Horowitz, Tony Jack

 



Empathy represses analytic thought, and vice versa: Brain physiology limits simultaneous use of both networks - sciencedaily.com

A number of earlier studies showed that two large scale brain networks are in tension in the brain, one which is known as the default mode network and a second known as the task positive network. But other researchers have suggested that different mechanisms drive this tension: One theory says that we have one network for engaging in goal directed tasks. This theory posits that our second network allows the mind to wander. The other theory says that one network is for external attention, and the second network is for internal attention.